रवीन्द्र र धवललाई राजद्रोहको मुद्दा, म्याद थप्न न्यायाधीश महर्जनको इजलासमा पेश

काठमाडौं । राप्रपाका वरिष्ठ उपाध्यक्ष रवीन्द्र मिश्र र महामन्त्री धवलशम्शेर राणाविरुद्ध राजद्रोहको मुद्दामा अनुसन्धानका लागि म्याद प्रक्रिया अघि बढेको छ ।

सरकारी वकिल कार्यालय काठमाडौंका प्रवक्ता गोकुलप्रसाद निरौलाका अनुसार नेताद्वयसहित ११ जनाविरुद्ध राजद्रोहको मुद्दा अघि बढाइएको हो ।

सरकारी वकिल कार्यालयबाट कानुनी प्रक्रिया पूरा गर्दै उनीहरूलाई जिल्ला अदालतमा उपस्थित गराइएको छ । काठमाडौं जिल्ला अदालतको न्यायाधीश तारादेवी महर्जनको इजलासमा म्याद थप सम्बन्धी बहस जारी छ ।

यस्तै पक्राउ परेका अन्य ३१ जनाविरुद्द आपराधिक उपद्रवमा म्याद थपको प्रक्रिया अघि बढाइएको छ ।

राजद्रोहको अभियोग पुष्टि भए अधिकतम २५ वर्षसम्मको कैद हुनसक्ने व्यवस्था छ । आपराधिक उपद्रवमा पाँच वर्षसम्म कैद हुनेछ । गत शुक्रवार राजावादीहरूको आन्दोलन हिंसात्मक बनेको थियो ।

आन्दोलनको क्रममा सार्वजनिक तथा निजी सम्पत्ति तोडफोडसहित लुटपाट समेत भएका थिए । उक्त घटनामा दुई जनाको ज्यान गएको थियो । आन्दोलन हिंसात्मक बनाउन उक्साएको भन्दै मिश्र र राणा पक्राउ परेका थिए ।

10 thoughts on “रवीन्द्र र धवललाई राजद्रोहको मुद्दा, म्याद थप्न न्यायाधीश महर्जनको इजलासमा पेश”
  1. Anavar, also known by its generic name oxandrolone, has become a staple in many bodybuilders’
    supplement rotations due to its reputation for promoting lean muscle gains while minimizing water
    retention. When athletes track their progress, they often look at clear before and after data points—body weight,
    body fat percentage, muscle circumference, strength levels,
    and even visual changes captured through photos or video recordings.
    By documenting these metrics prior to starting an Anavar
    cycle and comparing them once the cycle concludes, lifters
    can quantify how much lean tissue was added, whether the gains were truly “dry” or accompanied by some unwanted bloating, and if their overall physique has become more defined.

    Comparing the results before and after a cycle serves
    several practical purposes. First, it offers objective evidence of Anavar’s effectiveness
    for that particular individual. Because genetics, diet, training intensity, and supplement stack vary
    widely among users, a single anecdote is rarely enough to
    determine whether the steroid is working. A detailed record
    of weight, body fat percentage, and muscle measurements lets a user see
    if the increases in lean mass align with expected
    outcomes—typically 1–3 kilograms (2–7 pounds) of new muscle over an eight‑week cycle for
    someone who trains regularly. Second, these comparisons help identify any side effects or negative trends that might have emerged during use.
    If the body fat percentage rises despite careful dieting, it may signal hormonal
    imbalance or a shift in metabolism that requires adjustments to training or nutrition.

    In addition, tracking before and after data assists in refining future cycles.
    For instance, if a user notices that their arm
    circumference increased significantly while
    leg size lagged, they might decide to adjust their split or add more hypertrophy work
    on the legs during the next cycle. Similarly, strength metrics—such as 1‑RM for bench press,
    squat, and deadlift—can reveal whether Anavar has translated into functional
    gains. A noticeable uptick in powerlifting performance typically indicates that the drug
    is effectively enhancing muscle protein synthesis without compromising joint health.

    Why compare the results of oxandrolone before and
    after cycles? The answer lies in understanding how this anabolic steroid
    interacts with the body’s endocrine system.
    Oxandrolone has a relatively mild androgenic profile, which
    means it is less likely to cause masculinization or gynecomastia compared to other steroids.

    However, even its subtle effects can influence muscle growth rates, recovery speed,
    and fat metabolism. By evaluating performance and physique changes before starting the cycle and after completing it,
    athletes can isolate the drug’s impact from external variables such as training modifications or dietary tweaks.

    Moreover, this comparison is essential for gauging the longevity of Anavar’s benefits.
    Some users report a rapid increase in muscle mass during the first
    week or two of the cycle, followed by a plateau.
    By examining data points across the entire duration—weekly
    logs of weight and body fat percentage—a user can identify whether the anabolic stimulus
    was sustained or if tolerance began to creep
    in. If the results stagnate midway through the eight‑week
    period, it may prompt an adjustment: altering dosage, adding a
    supportive supplement like creatine monohydrate,
    or extending the cycle length slightly.

    Another compelling reason for before‑after comparisons is the
    psychological aspect of bodybuilding. The visual evidence of
    progress fuels motivation and can help athletes
    stay committed to their training regimen and nutritional plan. Seeing a measurable
    difference in muscle circumference or a clearer definition on a
    body photo can reinforce adherence to strict macro targets, such as a protein intake of 2 grams per
    kilogram of body weight or a calorie deficit aimed at fat loss during a
    cutting phase.

    It is also worth noting that Anavar’s performance profile is sometimes misinterpreted.
    Some claim it only works in bulking cycles, while others swear by its ability to preserve muscle mass
    during cutting phases. By systematically comparing results before and after both types of cycles—bulking or
    cutting—a user can determine how oxandrolone behaves under different hormonal environments.
    For example, a bodybuilder might start with a higher protein intake and calorie
    surplus in the bulking phase, then switch to a caloric deficit while continuing the same Anavar dosage during a cutting cycle.
    The before‑after data will reveal whether muscle retention was successful or
    if there was measurable loss of lean tissue.

    Finally, from a medical standpoint, tracking these metrics
    allows athletes to monitor potential health risks associated with steroid use.
    Oxandrolone can influence liver enzymes, cholesterol profiles, and blood pressure.
    By comparing baseline lab values taken before the cycle and follow‑up tests after completion, users can assess
    whether Anavar has caused any adverse changes.

    If LDL cholesterol rises or alanine aminotransferase levels increase significantly, it might indicate that a dosage adjustment
    or an extended post-cycle therapy (PCT) is warranted.

    In sum, documenting Anavar results in detail before and after
    each cycle is indispensable for bodybuilders who want to maximize
    gains, minimize side effects, and fine‑tune their training protocols.
    The comparative data not only quantifies the steroid’s impact on lean muscle mass, strength, and body composition but also serves as a safety net,
    ensuring that users remain informed about how oxandrolone interacts
    with their unique physiology throughout the anabolic journey.

parifoot-87’ लाई जवाफ दिनुहोस् जवाफ रद्द गर्नुहोस्

तपाईँको इमेल ठेगाना प्रकाशित गरिने छैन। अनिवार्य फिल्डहरूमा * चिन्ह लगाइएको छ